This today is only indirectly about Dr. Rekers, but it does resurrect the scandal. The Florida Attorney General's office contracted with Dr. Rekers to provide expert testimony to support the state's case that it is not in the best interest of children to be raised by two parents of the same sex. Reportedly he was paid over $100,000 by the state for this testimony.
That AG was Bill McCollum, who is now running for governor of Florida in the August Republican primary. At a public appearance, he was asked why he spent so much of the state taxpayer's money for such questionable evidence on the supposed dangers of gay adoption. [Actually, the evidence he peddles has been thoroughly discredited.]
McCollum's reply is astonishing. He must not have realized what he was revealing:
"He was the only available witness that had the credentials, willing to testify, and willing to produce the evidence. What we needed to have done was to put the records in the evidence."If it's so hard to find anyone with credentials who is willing to testify to dubious "evidence," maybe that's because the evidence is not only dubious but outright invalid. And no scientist of any standing or integrity would have agreed to this testimony.
So, not only is Rekers a gay man himself and utilizer of the services of a gay "rentboy" -- but he's also a lousy scientist and scholar and must have the integrity of a newt.
Ralph
Your conclusion Ralph of "integrity of a newt" is ambiguous.
ReplyDeleteNewt as in the amphibian, rough-skinned newt taricha granulosa of the Pacific Northwest that produces enough tetrodotoxin to kill an adult human, or, Newt Gingrich -- 2012 potential presidential candidate?
I had both in mind and used the word intentionally to include the blabbermouth himself. He is very aptly named -- newts look harmless but can be deadly.
ReplyDeleteNewt would be a disaster as president.