Pay attention, voters !!!    Evidence is fast piling up of Newt's  cynical lying and/or his cluelessness.  I personally think it's a unique  combination of the two:  Sometimes Newt is just outright making up  stuff and saying what he knows will excite his gullible crowd.  At other  times, he really doesn't know but has convinced himself at the moment  that he does know and he does believe what he's saying.
A couple of examples:
1.   The AJC's  fact-check column gave him a "pants on fire" false rating for his claim  about the food stamps program.  He's right that more people are on the  program than ever (isn't that what happens when people lose their jobs  and their homes and have no money?).   But he is dead wrong, and he's  got to be cynically lying, when he says that people are given credit  cards instead of stamps now and that some people redeem them for cash  and take trips to Hawaii.
The truth is that instead of stamps or  coupons, the program now issues a special debit card that can only be  used for very specific food items, can't be used in restaurants, can't  be used to buy alcohol, or even certain luxury foods.  And no way can  they get cash or go to Hawaii.  That's just plain a lie.  And Gingrich  either knows it -- or he is just cynically repeating some outrageous  claim from somebody's wild imagination.
2.  Rachel Maddow  skewered him for his retort to Nancy Pelosi in which he claimed that the  sanctioning of him by the Ethics Committee back in 1995 was politically  motivated.    Just look at the House vote count that sanctioned him with a  $300,000 fine:   395 to 28.
To be perfectly clear:  196 House Republicans voted to sanction Newt.
And  this week conservative Rep. Peter King (R-NY) said that Gingrich is too  erratic, too self-centered, and that he "does not have the discipline,  does not have the capacity to control himself. . . .  [If he is elected]  the country and Congress would be going through one crisis after  another."
This is a member of his own party who served under him  when he was Speaker of the House.  From the other side, Paul Begala  wrote in Newsweek:  "When I look at the economy, I think Obama can't win.   When I look at the Republican field, I think Obama can't lose."
Newt  is betting that the anti-Washington base he is pandering to won't be  listening to either of these Washington insiders, however.
Just  for safe measure, Newt made headlines of his own that swamped any such  criticism by telling the Republican Jewish Coalition that he would  appoint John Bolton as his Secretary of State.   Now that is a headline grabber.   And it did.
Ralph
PS:   Liberal blogger Jason Linkins has perhaps the best, succinct words to describe Newt:  "gaseous, grandiose, and divisive."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment