Tuesday, May 5, 2015

"Deal's way or the highway"

For anyone interested in Georgia politics and government, this column by Jay Bookman in the AJC is worth reading in full.    He exposes a pattern of Gov. Nathan Deal's usurping power unto himself as governor.   All the examples put together add up to a shocking array of similar moves -- the next big one being the proposed constitutional amendment to give the governor power to take over any school system that he deems "failing."

"Deal's way or the highway"
Jay Bookman, AJC, May 3, 2015

As Dink NeSmith tells it, he was removed from the University System’s Board of Regents a year ago because he was insufficiently submissive to Gov. Nathan Deal. In a newspaper column this week, Smith accused Deal of violating the independence guaranteed to the regents by the state constitution, calling the Deal administrationthe most domineering and arrogant” in the state’s history.

The response by Deal spokesman Brian Robinson?

“This is a tantrum by another name. ... When you don’t get asked to the prom, you can be cool about it and act like you have better things to do, or you can have a public meltdown on the school PA system and make wild accusations against the person who turned a blind eye to your inviting smiles.”

That doesn’t strike me as the response of an organization trying to refute an allegation of arrogance. It is instead a trumpeting of that arrogance. But given the record, it is hardly a surprise.

In 2014, Deal forced out two members of the Department of Community Health Board who dared to question a surprise proposal to increase nursing-home rates. (The chief beneficiaries included nursing-home owners who donated heavily to Deal.)  

[ShrinkRap Note:  And I would add that the nursing home association hired Gov. Deal's son-in-law for a job he had no qualifications for.  The same son-in-law whose business failure almost bankrupted Gov. Deal.  What made the deal smell so rotten was the fact that the state pays about a billion dollars a year to nursing homes for indigent care.   Of course, they denied hiring his son-in-law had anything to do with influence from the governor's office.]

In 2011, he forced Warren Budd, a well-respected Republican businessman, from the Department of Natural Resources Board, again for daring to exercise independent judgment. Budd’s story was similar to that of Smith: Under Deal, the DNR board was no longer allowed to function as a board, with Deal’s office even dictating whom the board elected as its officers.

Robinson’s response? “If anyone on any board considers himself indispensable, this is what educators call a ‘teachable moment.’ ”

Deal’s ambitions are also redrawing the basic architecture of state government.  In 2013, Deal stripped control of an honors program for top high-school students from the state Department of Education, giving it to the Governor’s Office of Student Achievement. In 2012, he shifted a major workforce-training program out of the constitutionally independent Department of Labor and into the Governor’s Office of Workforce Development.

As part of his criminal justice reform package, Deal will soon sign legislation creating the Governor’s Office of Transition, Support, and Reentry, giving it duties once performed by the Department of Corrections, the Board of Pardons and Paroles and the Department of Juvenile Justice. He also just stripped the state Soil and Water Commission of its independence to bring its functions under his influence.

Most infamously, his office was also secretly involved in hiring a new director of the state ethics commission, a supposedly independent agency that was then investigating Deal’s political fundraising. To put it mildly, his record both as a congressman and governor is that of a man who does not respect boundaries.

And in November 2016, Georgians will vote on a constitutional amendment giving Deal the power to take full control of local schools, stripping elected officials, voters and parents of any effective voice in their operation. The legislation does call for allowing “community feedback and input,” but if you listen to NeSmith, Budd and others, I’m not sure it’s wise to take much comfort in that.


No comments:

Post a Comment