Saturday, August 15, 2009

Republican Hypocrisy # 258

Maybe not 258. I lost count, but it's a lot of hypocrisy.

Here's the latest, reported by Greg Sargeant on his blog, The Plum Line:

GOP officials John Boehner, Thaddeus McCotter, Johnny Isakson, and Chuck Grassley all voted in 2003 for a measure very similar to the one in the current House health care bill they now suggest in various ways could lead to government-encouraged euthanasia.

As Time’s Amy Sullivan reported late last night, Grassley voted for the 2003 Medicare prescription drug bill, which — ready? — provided coverage for “counseling the beneficiary with respect to end-of-life issues and care options, and advising the beneficiary regarding advanced care planning.”

The only difference between the 2003 bill and the House Dem one that’s inspired the “euthanasia” talk, Sullivan reports, is that the earlier one “applied only to terminally ill patients.”

Let’s go back and check the roll call on that 2003 vote to see who else voted for it. Turns out Boehner, McCotter and Isakson all did, too.

Boehner and McCotter, as you know, have said that Medicare coverage of end of life consultations could lead to “government encouraged euthanasia.” While Isakson supports end of life counseling generally, he opposes the House bill because it allows “government to incentivize doctors by offering them money to conduct end-of-life counseling.” Grassley said people are “right to fear” that government could “decide when to pull the plug on grandma.”

Fun postscript: GOP Rep. John Mica of Florida voted for the 2003 bill — and last week he denounced the current House measure for creating Medicare-funded “death counselors.”

Sergeant gave an update: Boehner's office resonded that the comparison is "idiotic."

Please explain how it's idiotic, Sen. Boehner.

Ralph

1 comment:

  1. Add Sarah Palin to the list. Someone has found the proclamation she signed as governor in April 2008 for HealthCare Decisions Day, in which she advocated advanced case planning:

    "WHEREAS, Healthcare Decisions Day is designed to raise public awareness of the need to plan ahead for healthcare decisions, related to end of life care . . .

    "WHEREAS, one of the principal goals of Healthcare Decisions Day is to encourage hospitals, . . . and hospices to participate in a statewide effort to provide clear and consistent information to the public about advance directives, as well as to encourage medical professionals and lawyers to volunteer their time and efforts to improve public knowledge and increase the number of Alaska’s citizens with advance directives."

    What changed? It's called political expediency.

    ReplyDelete