He's now doing it for the New York Times, and his predictions about the Iowa caucuses are out. He not only gives standings but calculates the statistical chances of each person winning, using some kind of alchemy based on averages, trends, demographics, etc. For example, he gives Ron Paul a 25.7% share of the vote but a 52% chance of winning the caucuses.
That's right.
Nate Silver is predicting, based on current data, that Ron Paul has a 52% chance of winning the Iowa caucuses.And who comes in next? Romney has a 21.3% vote and a 28% chance of winning, followed by Newt with 13.9% vote and 8% chance of winning, nip and tuck with Rick Perry at 14% of the vote and 7% chance of winning. Bachmann and Santorum trail at 2% chance of winning each.
Does it mean anything? Iowa is still particularly volatile -- but it's getting pretty close and this seems right with the trends.
New Hampshire: Romney has 75% chance of winning, with Paul at 12% and Gingrich at 10%.
For what it's worth -- at least it's fun for me; good soap opera.
Ralph
An update on 12/21 shows the ever-shifting polls:
ReplyDeleteRomney and Paul are now tied, with 22% of the vote each, and each with a 40% chance of winning. Gingrich continues to trail with a 9% estimated chance of winning.