This warrants a separate post entry, because this is about Antony Weiner's qualifications for mayor, apart from any sexting scandal.
Listening to Chris Hayes on MSNBC tonight, I learned that, contrary to popular image, Anthony Weiner was not a good congressman. He didn't pass any significant legislation, he was not a behind the scenes worker or a coalition builder.
Quite the opposite. Chris cited one major piece of legislation that two of his fellow legislators from New York had worked on for months. He was not involved in the work. But once it reached the House floor, Weiner rushed to the microphone and made a big dramatic play for press coverage, trying to associate himself with credit for the bill.
Chris, along with two other liberal commentators, have very negative views of Weiner as an objectionable, narcissistic opportunist -- a performer who craves media attention, who puts on a great show but does not do the work required of a public office holder. We should not be fooled by all his progressive rhetoric. That may be what he believes and wants to make happen -- but he has no record of accomplishment.
Mind you, we're not talking about one of the deplorable Republican
congressmen with terrible policy positions; Weiner's stated positions and voting record are among the more progressive in
Congress. And still some of his sharpest critics are themselves progressives.
They all agreed: He would make a terrible mayor. They ridiculed all the hype from his supporters about how he should be forgiven for this scandal because he is so wonderful and has so much to offer as mayor. In fact, they said, there is absolutely nothing to back up this claim. He has no record of accomplishment or of hard work. Only of stubborn persistence in getting himself noticed -- and apparently a convincing charm that hooks the people around him.
Add this to his behavior concerning the sexting scandal x2. Even his confession x2 and his talk of rehab seem more of a display of "see how open and contrite I'm being." And then he keeps going on tv and keeping it all going.
My shrink thinking can't help coming into play here. I deplore the idea of diagnosing someone in absentia. But the behavior I have described above is consistent with narcissistic character disorder. In fact, if I were being less careful I would say it is virtually diagnostic.
Ralph
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
When a political figure's scandal reaches the point of ridicule like Weiner's has, it's probably too late. The comedy shows are having a ball; even the liberal news shows are ridiculing him.
ReplyDeleteAlex Witt, news analyst on MSNBC, last night signed off that segment by saying that just the names involved alone would just be too over the top with sexual innuendo if you were writing fiction: Weiner, Carlos Danger, and Leather (the last name of the woman he was sexting with).
And then there's the New Yorker cover -- brilliant !! It's a cartoon of Weiner, sitting astride the top of the Empire State Building, so that the spire seems to emerge from his crotch. He's taking a photo of it, while news helicopters circle around broadcasting it for us all to see.
This captures Weiner's megalomaniacal attention seeking, turning his transgression into a major media event.
And in a subtle, ridiculing way it says: We get that it's all about you and your penis, dodo. That's not what New York needs for a mayor.
ReplyDelete