The Editorial Board of the New York Times has endorsed Hillary Clinton for the Democratic presidential nomination.
* * *
"For
the past painful year, the Republican presidential contenders have been
bombarding Americans with empty propaganda slogans and competing,
bizarrely, to present themselves as the least experienced person for the
most important elected job in the world. Democratic primary voters, on
the other hand, after a substantive debate over real issues, have the
chance to nominate one of the most broadly and deeply qualified
presidential candidates in modern history. . . .
"Mrs.
Clinton’s main opponent, Senator Bernie Sanders, a self-described
Democratic Socialist, has proved to be more formidable than most people,
including Mrs. Clinton, anticipated. He has brought income inequality
and the lingering pain of the middle class to center stage and pushed
Mrs. Clinton a bit more to the left than she might have gone on economic
issues. Mr. Sanders has also surfaced important foreign policy
questions, including the need for greater restraint in the use of
military force.
"In
the end, though, Mr. Sanders does not have the breadth of experience or
policy ideas that Mrs. Clinton offers. His boldest proposals — to break
up the banks and to start all over on health care reform with a
Medicare-for-all system — have earned him support among alienated
middle-class voters and young people. But his plans for achieving them
aren’t realistic, while Mrs. Clinton has very good, and achievable,
proposals in both areas."
* * *
The full article of endorsement is much longer and more detailed. It's available online at
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/31/opinion/sunday/hillary-clinton-endorsement.html?action=click&pgt
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/31/opinion/sunday/hillary-clinton-endorsement.html?action=click&pgt
No comments:
Post a Comment